Ern Malley and the Ridiculousness of Modern Poetry

“Stay away from most modern poems. It’s crap! It’s not poetry!”

— Ray Bradbury, 2001

One thing that I think you ought to know about me is that I’ve never liked modern poetry. True, I greatly admire W. H. Auden, and I’ve even found a “slam poet” or two whose work impresses me, but other than these, I’ve always found modern poetry, for the most part, to be inaccessible, self-deluded, and needlessly ugly. Apparently, I’m not the only one who thinks so.

When the modernist movement first emerged in the twentieth century, it was immediately met with criticism and disgust from the more traditional poets of the world. Two of these poets, Australians James McAuley and Harold Stewart, fashioned from their disdain one of the best literary pranks of all time.

In mid-1940’s, when the modernist movement in poetry was at its height, McAuley and Stewart hatched a plan to expose modernist poetry for the tripe it is. Using random lines copied from whatever books happened to be within reach, they penned sixteen poems, all of which were purposely devoid of meaning and cohesion. They then mailed the poems to Max Harris, editor of the literary magazine Angry Penguins, using the joint pseudonym Ern Malley. Accompanying the submission was a letter, supposedly written by Malley’s sister Ethel, saying that she discovered the poems shortly after her brother’s death and would like Harris to tell her if there is any literary merit in them.

Cover art from the edition of Angry Penguins that unleashed Ern Malley onto the world. Source.
Cover art from the edition of Angry Penguins that unleashed Ern Malley upon the world. Source.

McAuley and Stewart’s idea wasn’t a new one: in 1926, a twenty-eight-year-old C. S. Lewis had tried to play a similar trick on T. S. Eliot, who was then the editor of The Criterion. However, unlike Lewis, McAuley and Stewart’s verses were not only published, but they were also lauded by the modernist establishment. Max Harris was particularly impressed, even running a special issue of Angry Penguins with a whole segment dedicated to Malley’s work. However, soon after the poems were published, the public already began to suspect that Ern Malley was not who he claimed to be. Eventually, Stewart and McAuley were found out after a journalist friend of Stewart’s gave the scoop to her boss. Not only was Max Harris humiliated, but he was also later prosecuted for publishing the Ern Malley poems, which the Australian government found to be “obscene.”

James McAuley later went on to write more serious verse (under his real name), but his devotion to strict, traditional forms, coupled with his right-leaning views and his conversion to Roman Catholicism, ensured that he went largely unnoticed by the literati. The Ern Malley poems, however, have endured, with poets such as John Ashbery having praised them in the past.

It’s all very amusing, but very sad too. According to McAuley and Stewart, their whole design in staging this hoax was to answer this question: “Can those who write, and those who praise so lavishly, this kind of writing tell the real product from consciously and deliberately concocted nonsense.” The answer, it would seem, is no.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Ern Malley and the Ridiculousness of Modern Poetry

  1. I do enjoy some modern poetry, but I’ve always enjoyed older poems and older literature general more than modern pieces. Older literature just seems to hold so much more resonance and depth of meaning than some modern books. Going back to poetry, I’m really not a fan of nonsense poems at all because I want a poem that will challenge me to think and actually have some substance. Otherwise I’m just feeling my mind with useless ramblings. I also don’t like the modern attitude toward poetry. Granted, there are some wonderful modern poets and teen writers that take the craft very seriously. However, a lot of students at school seem to think poetry is easy because poems are short. I think a lot of people are under the impression that poems don’t need to be revised, so they just slap down a bunch of words and call it a poem. Poetry is so much more than that, and in reality, it requires much revision to write a good poem. I really wish more people would realize that.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. My dad and I were just talking about that: how older forms of art (poetry, music, etc.) are nearly always better and more complex than more recent attempts at “art.” Funny how “progress” usually looks like a step backward.

      I think nonsense poems are all right sometimes (After all, you can’t be firing on all cylinders all the time. Or at least I can’t. 😉 ), but it’s when people try to elevate nonsense to the level of real literature that I have a problem with it. I mean, what’s the point of writing a poem if it doesn’t communicate anything?!

      I think by trying to make poetry more “accessible” or “relatable” to their students, teachers have actually drug it down as an art form by making students think that any random smattering of words qualifies as a poem. Writing poetry is actually much harder than people are led to believe, in part because poems are so short: you only have a very small amount of space in which to present an idea and make a logical point about it, all while weaving in all sorts of metaphors, imagery, sound devices, etc. Poetry is one of the hardest things in the world to write and here everyone born in the twentieth century and afterward thinks it’s easy!

      Like

Leave a reply.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s